Archive | March, 2010

Open Thread

People seem to want to debate policy options, which I encourage. There may be other topics not covered in existing threads. Also, this might be a place to suggest new topics for posts. Have at it!

Continue reading

Blog Etiquette – Poll

As readers will know, I copied some comments from CA comparing Jones to Mengele. I was later informed that Steve McIntyre moderated the comments, deleting them completely. I ask my readers the following question: How should I deal with the deleted posts comments over at CA:

Continue reading

Get Yer IOP Porkies here!

This post is all about the IOP’s submission and its misinterpretation in traditional media and on the net. Here, for reference, is the IOP’s statement clarifying its position on global warming in order to counter the denialists’ misinterpretation: Here, for reference, is the IOP’s submission. What are the implications of the disclosures for the integrity […]

Continue reading

Coverage of the Hearings

The response to the hearings is predictable. Traditional media: The Daily Mail: Giving evidence to a Science and Technology Committee inquiry, the Institute of Physics said: ‘Unless the disclosed emails are proved to be forgeries or adaptations, worrying implications arise for the integrity of scientific research and for the credibility of the scientific method. ‘The […]

Continue reading

Thoughts on the Inquiry – Panel One

Currently, the British Parliament House of Commons Science and Technology Committee is considering the issue of the controversy surrounding the CRU Email theft and has held a hearing today, March 1, 2010, to question key players in the matter. My conclusion on what this does to the skeptics? I think the image says it all.

Continue reading

Blogging the Inquiry

I’m at home with a sick child today and am listening to the Parliamentary Inquiry. Will post what I can when I have something below but my impression of the first panel after hearing the final panel? Will re-listen to the inquiry and post my thoughts and select bits of transcripts.  Suffice to say a […]

Continue reading