Archive | January, 2010

More Questionable IPCC Sources

Now, this is really silly… According to a report in the Telegraph, the IPCC AR4 included references to a climber’s magazine article and an MA Thesis to support its claims about glacier loss and global warming impacts. The IPCC WG2 report, Chapter 1, Section 3.2 on “Observed effects due to changes in the cryosphere cites […]

Continue reading

Anatomy of a Story: Water Vapour Article in Science

The latest story to start circulating is based on a new paper publised in the journal Science. I paid for a copy of it and have been reading it. I’m interested in following how the story gets translated by various media and blogs, so this post will be for that purpose. First, the abstract of […]

Continue reading

Right on Cue: FOX News on Amazongate

As I expected, FOX News, that bastion of fair and balanced reporting, has picked up on the Amazongate kerfuffle and has posted a story on its oneline site. Here is an excerpt from the article titled U.N.’s Global Warming Report Under Fresh Attack for Rainforest Claims In the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), issued in 2007 by […]

Continue reading

Hit me with your best shot

This post is your chance to convince me.  It is intended to let you post the most compelling evidence you have come across that supports your view of the global warming issue. But please, provide me with links to compelling evidence — not something that is just opinion. In other words, no editorials unless the […]

Continue reading

Mea Culpa : IPCC and “Gray” Literature

A mea culpa. I’ve heard repeated the statement that the IPCC is supposed to only use “peer-reviewed” literature in its reports so many times, I assumed it was true. ETA: I’ll use this post to record the other mea culpas out there from media and bloggers who repeated the misinformation. Here, thanks to Climateprogress, are the […]

Continue reading

Amazongate Porkies – I’ll start my collection here

I’m not defending actual mistakes — I will do a separate post on the IPCC and floods issue later, once I’ve done a bit of sleuthing myself.  But there are lies and obfuscation circulating now that I would like to track, including about the Amazongate issue. Amazongate is gaining traction in the blogospew.  Now, there […]

Continue reading