Tag Archives: AGW

Shooting the Messenger — Denialism and the EPA Endangerment Finding

This is how it’s done, folks. You don’t like the findings of science? It’s too ‘inconvenient’ to you for whatever reason — economic, political, ideological? Too many billions of dollars in profits to make? Too many lush political contributions to garner? Too many ideological beliefs that threaten your identity if shattered? Two options: like George […]

Continue reading

The Eternal Return or: The Unbearable Wrongness of Spencer and Braswell

There is a concept in philosophy that posits that the universe will repeat itself, in an endless cycle of recurrence. This means that everything in your life will be repeated again and again and again… All your hard work trying to arrive at some vestige of truth, some facts you can rely on, some firm […]

Continue reading

MSM Coverage

Seems like the reputable media are starting to recognize what’s going on with respect to Climategate and the IPCC ‘Gates’ so hyped by the denialists and pseudoscience blogs. There’s an editorial in today’s New York Times about Yvo de Boer’s resignation from the UN. What’s key is that they recognize that the ‘mistakes’ in the […]

Continue reading

Eyeballing and other nonsense

Over at Skeptical Science — a must read for those interested in sound explanations of climate science — John Cook has posted an analysis and refutation of an American Thinker article by Gary Thompson. Let’s look briefly at Gary Thompson’s article, The AGW Smoking Gun.  First of all, note the title. Every skeptic and denier […]

Continue reading

More lies, damned lies and statistics…

Over at Open Mind, Tamino has done it again – pointing out errors in the “skeptic” so-called science used to deny global warming. He reviews the work of Steven Goddard posted at Watts Up With That, which claims that it’s getting increasingly snowy over the Northern Hemisphere — an increase according to his data of […]

Continue reading

Turtles all the way down

One of the favorite claims of ‘skeptics’ — and I’m growing more and more hesitant about using that term without scary quotes because there just doesn’t seem to be any real ones around, at least as far as I can see — is that NASA or NOAA or CRU or other climate researchers selectively alter […]

Continue reading