Tag Archives: denialists

Right on Cue: FOX News on Amazongate

As I expected, FOX News, that bastion of fair and balanced reporting, has picked up on the Amazongate kerfuffle and has posted a story on its oneline site. Here is an excerpt from the article titled U.N.’s Global Warming Report Under Fresh Attack for Rainforest Claims In the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), issued in 2007 by […]

Continue reading

On Pillar Toppling

I have a day off today and have been surfing a number of websites looking at elements of the skeptic criticism of AGW theory. Chylek’s letter got me thinking about these pillars he sees as being undermined by the CRU emails and why I have been so little moved by all the evidence skeptics have […]

Continue reading

Himalaya Glaciers, IPCC and 2035

Over at Climate Audit, my new most favorite place for a good laugh, and head shake, McI has another post about the Himalaya 2035 IPCC AR4 mistake. One might think, given the coverage on his blog, that he’s … gloating? No. Not the puzzle solver. He’s just solving puzzles. Not speculating about motives or attacking […]

Continue reading

Petty Petty Puzzler

Over at Climate Audit, McIntyre has a post on a line from one of the EA emails.  It’s all about the Y2K correction and the comment that someone should “hide” the article by Hansen “”. Here is the quote: Jim, please check if everything is fine. Robert, please move to the CU site and hide […]

Continue reading

Trenberth on the real travesty

Over at “A Few Things Ill Considered” Coby posts about Trenberth’s recent article in The Daily Camera on the travesty that is the way his email commenting on the “travesty” of being unable to account for the lack of warming is being misrepresented around the net. Coby writes: It is a constantly, and often intentionally, […]

Continue reading

New Deletions — Funding and Bias

A number of posts were deleted over at CA, specifically regarding how funding does or does not bias research. I did graduate work on the pharmaceutical industry and problems with bias, so I am familiar with the literature on how funding from industry sources results in more favorable results than studies that have no industry […]

Continue reading